I am talking with the girl who i was “ranting” earlier, the one who doesn’t got rude with me for nothing… And just send this to her and wanted to ramble a little more here.

About the books and the show. And no, I AM NOT RANTING…And most cases i just DON’T say about it because people got to emotional and start to yell at each other…

I love both equally. I mean it. They are so very different in their core and i love both. I think TB is just misunderstood by MANY, the books are more easy to KNOW exactly what sookie is thinking and CH, the show don’t… you have to see between lines, its always like that TV x book. And i love both the clearer path and the one i have to think more.

That’s actually exactly the two things i love about books and cinema in general.

Some books are indeed more difficult to read between those lines, put most of them, the narrator tell us almost all we have to know. It’s clearer, not that is easy, it’s not what i am saying.

But on TV, Cinema, and etc…the things must be more interesting. In books we have to imagine, on TV we have the image, so how they can work our imagination like on the books? Working on the subtle, on what is not so in front of the eyes.

I am not saying that is just one path. Everyone sees things in their own way, but i think sometimes our entire era lacks of imagination…To read a book like SVM is not so difficult to imagine things, to see how CH sees it (maybe not how the characters looks because i much prefer Alex as Eric :P), but on other hand almost everyone sees True Blood as the eyes shows: easy. And it’s not. And i am not saying this because i like the show, i am saying because the WHOLE television/cinema is like that, you have to think the details not what is just plain.

Like i said, i love BOTH. And sometimes makes me sad how people can misunderstood both of them. You have to see beyond the simple lines.

Rambling on.